Saturday, 18 October 2008

Tempelhof Airport, Berlin

Opened in 1923, Tempelhof is one of the world's oldest airports still in operation and one of three airports in Berlin. It was completely reconstructed by the Nazis between 1936 and 1941 and at the time was one of the largest manmade structures on Earth. After the war the airport played a major role in the Berlin Airlift and the USAF operated from it throughout the Cold War, but its use declined thereafter. Sadly this historic airport's days are numbered and it is scheduled to close at the end of this month, the plan being that nearby Schonefeldt will be expanded and will eventually bcome Berlin's sole airport.

© Christopher Seddon 2008

Monday, 13 October 2008

Berliner Fernsehturm

Located near Alexanderplatz in what was then East Berlin and constructed between 1965 and 1969, the Berliner Fernsehturm (TV Tower) is easily visible across the whole of Berlin, as its instigator, Walter Ulbricht presumably intended. Ironically, the design was based on a similar structure in Stuttgart, in the capitalist west!

The tower is featured in English artist Tacita Dean's 2001 work entitled 'Fernsehturm' and in 2006 the sphere was decorated as a football to mark Germany's hosting of the World Cup, a tournament that the Germans uncharacteristically failed to win.

The tower is shown framed between two stairwells of the now-demolished Palast der Republik, another icon of the former Communist regime.

© Christopher Seddon 2008

Monday, 6 October 2008

Sun houses, Amersham

The Sun houses of Highover Park, Amersham were a later addition to the Amyas Connell-designed High and Over apartment complex. John Betjemin initially described them as "scandalizing all Buckinghamshire", but later became a fan. The buildings are now all regarded as classics of the Modernist style.

© Christopher Seddon 2008

Wednesday, 1 October 2008

St Giles Court, WC2

Bearing a curious resemblance to the trilithons of Stonehenge, the superstructure of the new St Giles Court development towers over the surrounding streets. The mixed-use complex is expected to open in 2010.

© Christopher Seddon 2008

Sort out cyclists!

As a pedestrian, I’m going to say it out loud: it’s time cyclists were licensed like other road users and bicycles were taxed, insured and carried number-plates like other vehicles. I am what might be termed a super-pedestrian in that I walk some 90 minutes to work every morning. This has enabled me to avoid the horror of the tube (and the gym), but has brought its own problems. At least once a week I experience what would be known in aviation circles as a near-miss involving a cyclist travelling at Tour-de-France speeds along the pavement. In addition, when crossing a road I have to bear in mind that at pedestrian crossings, the green man does not confer right of way over cyclists; “No Entry” signs do not apply to cyclists; and of course red lights certainly do not apply to cyclists. That I have not to date been involved in a collision with one of these selfish idiots is a matter of pure luck, which can hardly continue forever.

I would introduce a category for bicycles on the current driving licence and require all cyclists aged 16 and over to take a test. I would combine motoring and cycling offences into a single category of road traffic offences, which would mean that miscreant cyclists could find themselves banned from driving as well as cycling. Cycling on the pavement would carry a minimum six-month ban from all classes of vehicle. Stiffer penalties would be imposed in cases involving pedestrian injury, including possible jail sentences.

Calls for registration of cyclists and bicycles invariably meet with howls of protest from cycling groups. Only a “tiny minority” of cyclists flout the rules is the usual line. It’s a nonsensical argument. Should we legalise armed robbery because only a “tiny minority” hold up banks? More to the point, there are a lot of cyclists in London, the number having almost doubled since 2000. According to TfL, around half-a-million journeys are now made by bicycle per day. It only takes a small percentage consistently flouting the rules to cause mayhem.

Other frankly lame arguments include “bureaucracy”, “cost”, “it’ll put people off cycling”, etc. But you can’t have your cake and eat it. Until cyclists are subject to the same regulations as other road users, pedestrians will continue to be at constant risk from lawless idiots and the public perception of cyclists - good and bad alike – is unlikely to improve.

(This 400-word piece was written for "The Columnist" in The London Paper. It has not as yet been published.)

© Christopher Seddon 2008